Tuesday, October 30, 2018
(The following questions are not meant to be exhaustive, but only to open up some of the questions which are important for Law and Gospel preachers; specifically we ask, "How is the Word at work?" To learn more about this unique genre of preaching, see my brief guide to Law and Gospel preaching, Afflicting the Comfortable, Comforting the Afflicted, available from wipfandstock.com or amazon.)
1. How does the Word function in the text? The Word of the prophet is pure gospel. God will provide a feast, destroy death, and wipe the tears from our eyes. The only thing we can do in the face of this amazing God is rejoice.
2. How is the Word not functioning in the text? There is really no word of Law here, except, of course, the mention of "the shroud that is cast over all peoples, the sheet that is spread over all nations", (i.e. death). If the Law always functions to show us our need for Christ, then the mere mention of death shows us our need for Christ, and thus is a word of Law.
3. With whom are you identifying in the text? We are the people of Israel, God's people, to whom this good word is addressed. We are the ones who experience the shroud and the sheet which is spread over the nations. We are the ones who rejoice in the salvation of our God.
4. What, if any, call to obedience is there in this text? The last phrase is our call: "Let us rejoice and be glad in [God's] deliverance." We are called to point to the deliverance of our God and give God all praise and thanks.
5. What Law/Gospel couplet is suggested by this text? Some of the most classic couplets are appropriate for this text: defeat/victory; death/life; mourning/rejoicing. They are all here.
6. Exegetical work: The Lutheran Study Bible does a nice job of pointing out how Isaiah 24:1-27:13 contain a combination of prophecy and apocalyptic literature. While Biblical prophecy is "generally linked with historical times and places," apocalyptic literature "moves to cosmic themes and often refers to things seemingly impossible in history as we know it." Such are the verses we encounter in this text. Clearly announcing the annihilation of death is beyond history as we know it. So what we have is an apocalyptic text revealing an end to the world as it stands. A translation of this brief text reveals an ongoing use of the Piel and Pual forms of verbs. These forms are intensifiers. So a word which could be translated "swallow" could more aptly be translated "devour". And a word which is translated "waiting" could more accurately be translated "looked eagerly." These verbs reveal the intensity of this passage.
7. How does the Crossings Community model work with this text? Paul Jaster uses the language of this text well in offering his analysis. He works off of the "swallowing" of death by the death of Christ. He follows that with more swallowing as he witnesses to the great feast "of rich food, a feast of well-aged wines" which is to come. Bon Appetit! See crossings.org/text-study for the entire analysis.
Blessings on your proclamation!
Monday, October 22, 2018
(The following questions have been developed as a way of getting at some of the fundamental questions for Law and Gospel preachers. These questions are not meant to be exhaustive, but work well when combined with other sets of questions that come from a different perspective. In order to learn more about the genre of Law and Gospel preaching, see my brief guide, Afflicting the Comfortable, Comforting the Afflicted, available from wipfandstock.com or amazon.)
1. How does the Word function in the text? The opening verse says it all: "I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel." This promise is then fleshed out in the subsequent verses. In all cases God is the actor, putting the Torah in our hearts, forgiving sins, and remembering our sin no more. This word is pure Gospel.
2. How is the Word not functioning in the text? There is hardly a suggestion of Law in this text, i.e. any word which shows us our need for Christ. There is a reference to the former covenant, which God's people broke, but there is no accusation here. If we are going to preach Law from this text, we shall need to use other resources to accomplish this. One might readily turn to the Second Reading from Romans 3:19-28 where we hear that "all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God."
3. With whom are you identifying in the text? We will want to identify with the house of Israel and the house of Judah, those with whom God is making a new covenant. We too have broken covenant with God through our sin and long to be restored to God.
4. What, if any, call to obedience is there in this text? A call to obedience is not present here. We are not called here, albeit in plenty of other places in the writings of the prophet, to live faithfully in response to God's amazing grace.
5. What Law/Gospel couplet is suggested by this text? The language in this text gives us plenty of ideas for couplets: old covenant/new covenant; no knowledge of God/sure knowledge of God; guilty/sin remembered no more; forgiven.
6. Exegetical work: Scholars have named Jeremiah 30:1-31:40 The Book of Comfort or, in some cases, the The Book of Consolation. Scholars differ as to whether someone other than Jeremiah wrote this section using Jeremiah's name, perhaps to balance the prophet's many sermons of doom. In the 31st chapter there is much talk of a homecoming, God assembling the exiles back in their homeland: "There is hope for your future, says the Lord: your children shall come back to their own country." (31:17) Finally in 31:31 Yahweh speaks of establishing a new covenant (b'reeth). This term refers to a "binding settlement". (Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament, ed. Booterweck and Ringgren, vol. II, p. 255) There are different kinds of covenants: "In contradiction to the Mosaic covenants, which are of an obligatory type, the covenants with Abraham and David belong to the promissory type." (Ibid, p. 270) Jeremiah's covenant seems to fall into the promissory type. "The covenant idea is first given greater importance in Jeremiah. He rebukes the people who have broken the old covenant, but tells of a new covenant which Yahweh will make." (Ibid, p. 277). Such covenants were apparently a special feature of Israelite religion, which was the only religion "to demand exclusive loyalty" akin to husband and wife. No double or multiple loyalties were possible as in other religions. (Ibid., p. 278)
7. Consider the insights of the pioneers of the New Homiletic? There is no better time than when dealing with this text to follow Henry Mitchell's advice and pursue a celebration in this sermon. Mitchell said that the preacher should be the first one to experience the ecstasy of the gospel, and then should pass that on to the listeners.
Blessings on our proclamation!